Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo vs Samsung Galaxy M Pro which is better? (2024)

RAM

Internal

External

Score

Besides the chipset, memory is also an important component that users must consider when purchasing a device, as it is closely related to the device's performance.

For instance, multitasking is a simple example that highlights the importance of memory performance. If the RAM storage is insufficient, the user may not be able to run several apps simultaneously, and if the RAM runs out, the apps may crash, which can cause the device to reboot automatically.

Moreover, modern apps require large RAM usage to run smoothly, making the RAM sector a crucial factor in our matrix calculation score. We can say that 65% of the score comes from the RAM performance.

We also consider the internal storage when calculating our score. A larger internal storage size will result in a higher score, as the internal storage is crucial for multimedia purposes, among others. Therefore, we pay more attention to this sector.

However, we do not include external storage in our matrix score calculation because several modern users prefer to use cloud storage services instead of physical expansion memory. Furthermore, cloud storage services offer many benefits such as ease of use, safety, and lower cost, as opposed to buying external memory expansion, which is more expensive and less safe.

Rear

+

+

+

+

Front

+

+

Feature

Score

The camera feature is a brilliant thing that modern devices offer. With this feature, we can capture any moment as quickly as possible and share the result directly on social media to show others the interesting moments we capture.

Generally, modern devices come equipped with a single camera, while others have more than one camera setup. This is amazing because with a variety of camera lens styles on a single device, we can take photos in multiple styles, including portrait photos, landscape photos, or take photos of faraway objects using zoom cameras.

A good camera feature should produce high quality, clear images with low noise and offer multiple lens styles. You can determine the quality of the camera feature by looking at the score on the camera segmentation. If the score is high, that means the camera feature on that device is brilliant and very good.

For the matrix calculation, we not only consider individual camera specifications but also combine all information data. We consider how many camera lenses are available on the device, how good the main camera features are for both rear and front cameras, and how good the camera can be used for recording video. All of these factors directly impact the matrix calculation score.

Durability

Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo and Samsung Galaxy M Pro share a similar build quality as both devices are constructed with plastic materials. In this instance, as both phones employ the same build material, it results in a tie in terms of build quality. The overall durability and resilience of the devices would likely be comparable, and any distinctions would likely arise from additional design features or engineering considerations beyond the basic material used. Therefore, the build quality comparison between the Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo and Samsung Galaxy M Pro becomes a neutral factor due to their shared use of plastic.

Both of devices share a common feature in their covers, making their build quality comparable. The utilization of the same material underscores their uniformity in terms of both aesthetics and durability, leaving consumers to make their choices based on other distinguishing features or preferences in the Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo and Samsung Galaxy M Pro.

Visual Quality

In terms of visual quality performance, the Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo with its ~133 pixels per inch (ppi), is in direct competition with the Samsung Galaxy M Pro, which boasts an even higher ppi of ~217. The Samsung Galaxy M Pro gains an advantage in this comparison, as the higher ppi number signifies a more densely packed arrangement of pixels within a one inch square on its display.

This increased pixel density results in a sharper, more detailed visual experience. Pixels per inch (ppi) is a metric that quantifies the pixel density on a screen, and a higher ppi generally translates to a clearer display. In the case of the Samsung Galaxy M Pro, its elevated ppi of ~217 indicates a superior capacity to render images, text, and videos with increased clarity, making it more adept at providing users with a visually striking and clear display compared to the Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo.

In the realm of display panel technology, the Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo and Samsung Galaxy M Pro share a common ground, both featuring TFT screens. TFT brings forth advantages such as wide viewing angles, accurate color reproduction, and enhanced visibility. The identical utilization of TFT in both devices ensures that users can expect a consistent and reliable visual experience. This similarity becomes particularly notable in scenarios where display technology plays a pivotal role, providing users with a comparable and satisfactory viewing experience on both the Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo and Samsung Galaxy M Pro.

From the screen refresh rate features, the Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo and the Samsung Galaxy M Pro align with their 60Hz screen refresh rates. This commonality suggests that both devices deliver a comparable level of smoothness and responsiveness in visual interactions. The refresh rate, measured in hertz (Hz), determines how frequently a display refreshes per second, playing a pivotal role in optimizing the user experience, particularly during activities such as scrolling or gaming. In this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo and the Samsung Galaxy M Pro find themselves in a tie, providing users with an equally display performance.

Connectivity Features

If we compare the Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo and Samsung Galaxy M Pro, both are supported by 3G networks, their performance in this aspect will be a tie. The absence of a distinction in their network support positions the Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo and Samsung Galaxy M Pro on equal footing, making the performance in this regard identical. Users seeking advanced 3G connectivity features can find both devices to be equally capable, offering a comparable experience in terms of network performance.

Concerning Wi-Fi sector technology, Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo and Samsung Galaxy M Pro are on the same level, featuring with the Wi-Fi 4 technology. This similarity in wireless capabilities results in a tie when comparing their Wi-Fi technology. Both devices deliver similar performance in terms of data transfer speeds, connectivity, and efficiency. In this scenario, neither Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo nor Samsung Galaxy M Pro holds a distinct advantage over the other, as they share the same technological foundation in the realm of wireless connectivity.

Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo is equipped with advanced Bluetooth 4.0, surpassing the Samsung Galaxy M Pro, which only utilizes Bluetooth 3.0. This condition gives the Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo a distinct advantage, as Bluetooth 4.0 brings more enhancements in terms of data transfer speeds, range, and overall efficiency compared to Bluetooth 3.0. Therefore, the Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo is better and more technologically advanced in the realm of Bluetooth connectivity when compared to the Samsung Galaxy M Pro.

Unfortunately, both the Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo and Samsung Galaxy M Pro lack NFC features, resulting in a tie between them. The absence of NFC constrains these devices in terms of modern connectivity and functionality. NFC serves as a wireless technology that enables seamless data exchange between devices in close proximity, offering diverse applications such as contactless payments, swift file sharing, and simplified pairing with other compatible devices. Consequently, users of Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo and Samsung Galaxy M Pro may encounter limitations in fully exploiting the potential for hassle free connectivity.

RAM & Storage

Currently, a direct comparison of data is not feasible as the RAM data from both devices is not yet fully compiled. Until the comprehensive data sets for the Random Access Memory (RAM) of the respective devices are available, a meaningful analysis and comparison cannot be conducted.

Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.

Referring to the specification data, Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo emerges as the superior choice over Samsung Galaxy M Pro, evident in its internal memory configuration of 4GB, surpassing the 1GB range offered by the latter. The advantage of having a larger internal memory becomes apparent as it allows users to store a greater volume of data, including apps, photos, videos, and files. This expanded storage capacity is particularly advantageous for users with extensive multimedia libraries, those engaged in content creation, or those who require ample space for various applications. Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo higher internal memory range positions it as a more suitable option for individuals seeking a device with generous storage capabilities, accommodating diverse needs and ensuring a smoother user experience.

Differing from the Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo, the Samsung Galaxy M Pro stands out by offering an extra feature external memory expansion option. This feature, notably absent in the Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo, proves to be quite beneficial for users seeking versatility and increased storage flexibility. With this capability, users can enhance the device existing storage by adding a compatible external memory card. It's particularly advantageous for individuals needing extra space to store large files, multimedia content, or additional applications, all without being confined to the limitations of the device internal storage. The external memory expansion feature empowers users to personalize and expand their storage capacity based on their evolving needs, providing a convenient solution for those with dynamic or expanding data requirements.

Gaming Experience

Currently, it is challenging to assess the gaming experience on both devices as the essential data required for a comprehensive comparison is not yet available. Without a complete set of data, any attempt to measure and compare the gaming performance would lack the necessary foundation for accurate analysis. Once the requisite information is gathered, a more informed and reliable evaluation can be conducted, enabling a clearer understanding of the gaming experience on each device and facilitating a more meaningful comparison of their respective capabilities.

Camera Features

When it comes to the main camera features, both the Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo and Samsung Galaxy M Pro share a common ground, utilizing a Single Setup. The similarity in their camera configurations suggests that the two devices offer a comparable photography experience. So, in this case, the outcome is a tie, as both the Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo and Samsung Galaxy M Pro provide similar main camera capabilities, making it a matter of user preference and other device features when choosing between the two.

Transitioning to main camera resolution, the Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo introduces a 2 MP camera, while the Samsung Galaxy M Pro boasts an impressive 5 MP. In this aspect, the Samsung Galaxy M Pro holds the edge, as its larger megapixel count surpasses that of the Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo. The significance of a higher megapixel count lies in its ability to capture more intricate details and offer heightened clarity in images. A larger resolution facilitates extensive cropping and zooming capabilities without compromising on the quality of the captured content.

This advantage becomes particularly pronounced in scenarios where users prioritize precision and intricate detailing in their shots. While it's essential to consider other factors for a comprehensive evaluation of camera performance, a higher megapixel count, as evident in the Samsung Galaxy M Pro, often indicates a camera potential for delivering visually superior and finely detailed photographs.

Regrettably, the Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo lacks support for a front facing camera, rendering it unsuitable for capturing selfies. This limitation stands in stark contrast to the Samsung Galaxy M Pro, which boasts front facing camera features. In this context, Samsung Galaxy M Pro emerges as the superior choice, as it provides users with the capability to capture selfies, enhancing the overall versatility and functionality of the device. The absence of a front facing camera on the Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo may be a significant drawback for users who prioritize selfie taking capabilities in their smartphone selection criteria.

Sadly, the both of Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo and Samsung Galaxy M Pro are lack Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) feature in the video recording sector, leaving them with standard video recording capabilities. OIS is crucial for video recording as it helps mitigate the effects of hand movements, shakes, and vibrations, ensuring that the captured footage remains smooth and stable. Without OIS, videos recorded on devices like the Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo and Samsung Galaxy M Pro may suffer from noticeable jitteriness, particularly in situations where the camera is handheld or subject to external movements. The absence of OIS limits the devices ability to deliver professionally looking and steady video content, which can be a significant consideration for users who prioritize high quality video recording in various environments.

Battery Endurance

Examining the specifications in battery power, it becomes evident that the Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo falls short in comparison to the Samsung Galaxy M Pro. The Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo is equipped with a 1200 mAh battery, whereas the Samsung Galaxy M Pro boasts a more substantial 1350 mAh capacity. This slight but significant difference in battery capacity positions the Samsung Galaxy M Pro as the preferable choice for those prioritizing extended usage. The higher milliampere-hour rating of the Samsung Galaxy M Pro translates to a potentially longer lasting power performance, highlighting the importance of even small disparities in battery capacities when evaluating the overall endurance of devices.

Talking on fast charging capabilities, the Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo and Samsung Galaxy M Pro share a similar standing, as neither device is equipped with a fast charging feature. With both smartphones relying solely on standard charging methods, the absence of rapid charging technology levels the playing field. Consequently, users can expect a comparable charging experience from both the Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo and the Samsung Galaxy M Pro, eliminating any significant advantage in this aspect. The absence of fast charging features positions the devices on equal footing, resulting in a tie when it comes to evaluating their charging capabilities.

Security Features

Unfortunately, both the Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo and Samsung Galaxy M Pro lack dedicated biometric sensors for enhanced security. The overall tie in their performance highlights a shared limitation. The absence of a distinct advantage in terms of biometric security features suggests that, in the contemporary era where security is paramount, the lack of advancements in this aspect may be considered a drawback. In a landscape where technological innovations continually shape user experiences, the absence of distinctiveness in dedicated security sensors on both devices might be seen as a missed opportunity to provide users with a more advanced and secure means of device access and authentication.